|
Tuesday, September 24, 2002
Blair's dossier on Iraq, which is supposed to include all that evidence about what a terrible and immediate threat Iraq is, just seems to be a rehash of everything we've already been told. Blair's going to take it round to Germany and Russia, who he's going to try to convince to want to blow up Iraq.
Blair is demanding a new UN resolution that demands that Iraq readmit weapons inspectors, who have already agreed to, but much faster. Then, he said that Iraq knows how to hide things from weapons inspectors, so if they didn't find any nuclear bombs, it wouldn't prove anything, and the only way to be sure is to go over there and blow the country up.
I'd like to get to the bottom of this, sort of. I mean, why do they want to attack so bad? Is it just cause George and Dick want access to Iraq oil, and it's a diversion from the lagging war on terrorism and the failure to stablize Afghanistan and the fraudsters in the White House and the evil bent of American economics? If so, what's in it for Blair? His only support comes from the Conservatives, not his own party. Why does Bush have him so tightly wrapped around his finger?
|
|
